SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, California — November 5, 2026. Voters from Stockton to Tracy, Manteca, Lodi and the county’s smaller communities faced 14 statewide ballot propositions in the November 3 election. The official county election-night results show local voters divided almost evenly on Propositions 39 and 43. In both cases, the reported early local Yes margin is under 1,000 votes. These are county-only returns — they are not the statewide verdict on any proposition.
All 14 propositions, side by side
All Yes and No totals below come from the San Joaquin County Registrar of Voters’ November 3 general-election dashboard as available on November 5. The descriptions are condensed editorial labels for readers, not the complete official ballot titles. To evaluate a proposition’s legal effect, consult its official text and the California Voter Information Guide. All listed counts are unofficial.
| Measure | Topic (short description) | Yes | No | Local reported lead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prop. 1 | Veterans and housing assistance bonds | 66,805 | 50,161 | Yes by 16,644 |
| Prop. 2 | Budget stabilization and spending-limit changes | 62,452 | 54,451 | Yes by 8,001 |
| Prop. 3 | Income-tax extension for education | 64,004 | 53,574 | Yes by 10,430 |
| Prop. 4 | Public financing of election campaigns | 50,419 | 65,085 | No by 14,666 |
| Prop. 5 | Changes to state-officer recall elections | 49,228 | 64,350 | No by 15,122 |
| Prop. 37 | Homebuyer support financing | 70,783 | 45,680 | Yes by 25,103 |
| Prop. 38 | Immunology and immunotherapy research funding | 70,357 | 46,492 | Yes by 23,865 |
| Prop. 39 | Voter identification and citizenship verification | 59,421 | 58,569 | Yes by 852 |
| Prop. 40 | One-time wealth tax proposal | 46,296 | 72,046 | No by 25,750 |
| Prop. 41 | State tax spending-limit rules | 63,819 | 52,846 | Yes by 10,973 |
| Prop. 42 | Limits on taxes on certain personal assets | 75,442 | 42,142 | Yes by 33,300 |
| Prop. 43 | Local special-tax election requirements | 58,099 | 57,528 | Yes by 571 |
| Prop. 44 | Health-clinic spending requirements | 23,533 | 92,020 | No by 68,487 |
| Prop. 45 | Environmental-review changes | 61,890 | 53,613 | Yes by 8,277 |
Proposition 39: Yes 59,421, No 58,569
The voter-identification and citizenship-verification question, Proposition 39, records 59,421 Yes votes (50.36%) versus 58,569 No (49.64%). The current county-local lead is 852 Yes votes. This small percentage difference should be interpreted carefully: the result can change when eligible ballots are counted, and the county totals must not be conflated with statewide figures from different reporting times. A county-level Yes majority does not prove statewide adoption.
Proposition 43: an even closer local gap
On Proposition 43, concerning local special-tax elections and property-tax initiative rules, the report lists 58,099 Yes votes (50.25%) against 57,528 No (49.75%). That is a 571-vote Yes lead within San Joaquin County. In a statewide ballot question, the county’s local split may differ from California’s aggregate, so one must not declare a statewide result from a single county.
Other measures with different local voting patterns
Proposition 44 had a far larger reported local No majority: 92,020 No versus 23,533 Yes, on health-clinic spending requirements. Proposition 42 had 75,442 Yes versus 42,142 No on changes to taxation of certain assets. Proposition 40 had 72,046 No versus 46,296 Yes. These examples demonstrate that voter participation and preference vary by question; they do not support conclusions about why individual voters made their choices.
Why the sum of Yes and No changes by proposition
Not all voters select an option on every measure, and ballots may include undervotes or overvotes in individual contests. For instance, the total valid Yes/No selections for Proposition 39 are 117,990, whereas Proposition 44 has 115,553. Neither number is a definitive count of unique county voters, nor should those totals be added across propositions and described as ballots cast. Each separate ballot proposition needs its own valid-vote denominator.
Every city still has local choices of its own
Separate from statewide propositions, residents voted on local officials. California58 has published a Stockton council analysis, Tracy mayor and council report, and Manteca council results. City races do not have the same electorate as the countywide proposition table. The county ballot guide explains the distinction.
Next count and final deadlines
San Joaquin County is conducting a full canvass of eligible votes and plans its required one-percent manual tabulation starting November 9, with completion expected by November 25. Additional valid mailed and provisional ballots can affect the proportions above. California county results must be officially completed by December 3, with statewide certification December 11. The time and reporting scope of each result should accompany any subsequent update. Nothing in this report is a certified statewide ballot-measure outcome.
Primary source: San Joaquin County Registrar of Voters, November 3 general election preliminary results; official California voter guide and county audit schedule. Accessed November 5, 2026.
Support independent journalism for all Californians
Support reporting, public information and community coverage across California’s 58 counties.
Donate once by card ↗Support California58
Choose how to support California58:
Credit / Debit Card via StripeChoose an amount from $1. One-time support through the publisher's LINKERNO Stripe account.
Continue with PayPal Continue with ZelleZelle payments go to Vitaly Ataev Troshin. Please verify the recipient in your bank before sending. Availability depends on your bank.
Optional reader support. Contributions are not advertised as tax-deductible. Support does not influence editorial decisions.USEFUL SERVICES
Useful services from our ecosystem
AFFILIATED RESOURCE
Travel smarter worldwide
OptionTripAI-powered trip planning for journeys in California and around the world.
Explore OptionTrip →AFFILIATED RESOURCE
Free tax & property tools
TaxesTimeFree preliminary tax and property tools, including the Property Tax Savings Report.
Explore TaxesTime →AFFILIATED RESOURCE
California document support
LegalDocSVCDocument preparation support for self-represented Californians. Not a law firm and not legal advice.
Explore LegalDocSVC →WORK WITH CALIFORNIA58
Have a story, project or partnership idea?
California58 welcomes news tips, interviews, video projects, community partnerships, advertising and other California-focused collaborations.
Work with California58 →
COMMUNITY
Comments
Join the California58 conversation. You must be signed in to comment.
Create a free California58 account or sign in with an available social provider.